The reporter behind it Blake LivelyIn the infamous “nightmare” interview, the actress was accused of trying to distract the internet with her Met Gala Look.
Journalist Kjersti Flaa claimed the 38-year-old actress tried to distract viewers by attending the glitzy event just hours after she sat down suit against Justin Baldoni.
- Kjersti Flaa, who was humiliated by Blake Lively during a 2016 interview, shared her steamy comments about the star’s appearance at the Met Gala.
- The interviewer was scheduled to testify in the now canceled trial against Lively.
- “I wanted to reveal a lot of things that I’m sure they weren’t happy about,” Flaa said.
- She claimed Lively settled with Justin Baldoni because she knew she had a “weak case.”
Flaa was scheduled to testify on behalf of Baldoni’s production studio during the now-cancelled trial.
Kjersti Flaawho was humiliated by Blake Lively during a 2016 interview, shared her steamy comments about the star’s appearance at the Met Gala
Photo credit: Flaawsometalk
Kjersti Flaa has not forgotten how she was humiliated by Blake Lively during an interview in 2016, which resurfaced in 2024 amid the controversy surrounding Lively and Justin Baldoni’s problems in 2024 It ends with us Sentence.
“The Blake Lively interview made me want to quit my job,” Flaa wrote after dusting off the old clip and resharing it online.
The resurfaced interview showed Lively and her co-star Parker Posey promoting their Woody Allen film Café society.
Photo credit: bestofcarpet
The interview began with the journalist congratulating Lively on being pregnant with baby No. 2, saying, “Congratulations on your little bump.”
However, that is gossip Girl Alum didn’t have a heartfelt “thank you” to say. Instead, she cheekily replied: “Congratulations on YOUR little bump,” even though Flaa wasn’t pregnant.
After sharing the clip on YouTube, Flaa asked exasperatedly: “Isn’t it okay to congratulate someone on their pregnancy…?”
“The interview with Blake Lively made me want to quit my job,” Flaa wrote after dusting off the old interview excerpt and resharing it online
Photo credit: Flaawsometalk
Photo credit: Maybe_wint1760
The wounded reporter was called as a witness to testify on behalf of Baldoni in the now-cancelled trial. Last month, Lively’s legal team tried to prevent the viral interview from being used as evidence, but Baldoni’s team argued that her testimony was “highly relevant.”
After Lively’s performance at the 2026 Met Gala, Flaa shared her glowing comments about the actress’ “delusions.”
“It blows my mind that she would do that [attend]. But I think she wanted to flood the internet with stories about her at the Met Gala and what she was wearing, it was an attempt to drown out all the negative news,” she said Daily Mail.
Photo credit: bestofcarpet
“That’s what she and [her husband] “Ryan Reynolds has done it again and again,” she continued, “they try to manipulate.” [the internet] and the public by spreading stories that are kind and pro-telling.”
The Norwegian journalist felt it said a lot about Lively’s “boldness and courage” to stand in front of a crowd on fashion’s biggest night and say, “Hey, look at me in this dress.”
“In her reality, she still can’t believe that people don’t like her. That’s why she went to the Met Gala,” she added.
The Norwegian reporter claimed she couldn’t believe Lively still believed people loved her
Kjersti Flaa stopped by Hot Mics to talk about her viral baby bump interview with Blake Lively. #BlakeLively#KjerstiFlaa#Interview#littlebumppic.twitter.com/vk9TXDi3yd
– Hot Mics with Billy Bush (@hotmicsbilly) April 14, 2026
Flaa believes her comments would be seen by the public A simple favor actress as part of an “orchestrated smear campaign” against her because she “believes people still love her.”
“It’s such a delusion. She really believes that…that’s the tragedy of the whole thing,” she continued. “In her wildest imagination she can’t imagine people not liking her.”
Flaa went on to say that she was deeply “disappointed” by the Lively-Baldoni agreement last week because it meant she would not get a chance to testify against her.
Photo credit: kjersti_flaa
“I was looking forward to it. I was looking forward to telling my side of the story and supporting what I strongly believe is the truth here,” she told the outlet.
The reporter claimed that Lively agreed because she knew she had a “weak case” and everyone must have told her to “let it be.”
“It would have been so humiliating for her to lose, and you never want to look like a liar in front of a jury,” she said.
Flaa claimed Lively put up with Baldoni because she knew she had a “weak case.”
Photo credit: Justinbaldoni
Photo credit: sweetsucre
Last week, Lively and Baldoni settled their lawsuit, weeks before a trial was scheduled to begin.
Lawyers for both sides called the settlement a “victory” for their own clients, but neither party made any money from the settlement.
Sources also estimated that the stars have spent a total of $60 million on their lawsuits against each other.
Photo credit: Sony Pictures Releasing
According to court documents, the actress could be awarded an unspecified amount of damages, depending on a judge’s decision related to a California law passed in 2023.
The law allows individuals who successfully defend against certain defamation suits involving retaliation related to allegations of sexual harassment to seek compensation for their legal fees and additional damages.
The controversy began after Lively and Baldoni clashed on stage It ends with us which led to the actress suing him in December 2024 for, among other things, sexual harassment and retaliation.
Photo credit: bestofcarpet
Baldoni hit back with a $400 million countersuit accusing Lively and Reynolds of defamation and extortion, but the suit was dismissed.
If given the opportunity to take the stand, Flaa said she planned to “tell the truth about what actually happened.” She also said she wasn’t surprised when Lively’s legal team tried to prevent her 2016 interview from being used as evidence in court.
“I wanted to reveal a lot of things that I’m sure they weren’t happy about,” Flaa said of the testimony against Lively
Lively’s team would have claimed the resurfaced interview was part of Baldoni’s “smear campaign” against her, but “I was able to basically prove the opposite of what she was trying to prove,” Flaa said.
She claimed she was the only person who had access to the analysis of the YouTube video and claimed that no one had “amplified” it online.
“I wanted to reveal a lot of things that I’m sure they weren’t happy about,” she added.
“The reporter is 100% right,” one said online, while another wrote: “A wise man once said, ‘They hate us because they’re not us'”
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes
PakarPBN
A Private Blog Network (PBN) is a collection of websites that are controlled by a single individual or organization and used primarily to build backlinks to a “money site” in order to influence its ranking in search engines such as Google. The core idea behind a PBN is based on the importance of backlinks in Google’s ranking algorithm. Since Google views backlinks as signals of authority and trust, some website owners attempt to artificially create these signals through a controlled network of sites.
In a typical PBN setup, the owner acquires expired or aged domains that already have existing authority, backlinks, and history. These domains are rebuilt with new content and hosted separately, often using different IP addresses, hosting providers, themes, and ownership details to make them appear unrelated. Within the content published on these sites, links are strategically placed that point to the main website the owner wants to rank higher. By doing this, the owner attempts to pass link equity (also known as “link juice”) from the PBN sites to the target website.
The purpose of a PBN is to give the impression that the target website is naturally earning links from multiple independent sources. If done effectively, this can temporarily improve keyword rankings, increase organic visibility, and drive more traffic from search results.








